Commonwealth v. Shatzer, J.
This text of Commonwealth v. Shatzer, J. (Commonwealth v. Shatzer, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 55 MM 2022 : Respondent : : Petition for Leave to File Petition for : Allowance of Appeal from the Order v. : of the Superior Court : : JAMES KEVIN SHATZER, : : Petitioner : :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2022, in consideration of the Petition for Leave
to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc, this matter is REMANDED
to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County to determine, within 15 days of this
order, whether counsel of record, Attorney Eric John Weisbrod, should be permitted to
withdraw pursuant Pa.R.Crim.P. 120. If the trial court permits counsel of record to
withdraw and determines that Petitioner is entitled to court-appointed counsel, the trial
court shall appoint new counsel within 30 days of this order. Finally, either counsel, or
Petitioner if proceeding pro se, shall file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 90 days
of this order. Commonwealth v. Williams, 48 A.3d 1243 (Pa. 2012) (per curiam order)
(remanding petition for leave to file petition for allowance of appeal nunc pro tunc for
determination of whether counsel should be permitted to withdraw and filing of petition for
allowance of appeal).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Shatzer, J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-shatzer-j-pa-2022.