Commonwealth v. Selenski
100 A.3d 206, 627 Pa. 352, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2242
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 29, 2014·No. Appeal, No. 402 MAL 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO Petitioner’s first issue, as stated by Petitioner:
Does the constitutional right to present a defense include the right to offer proven science bearing on the understanding of human memory and perception, and police practices in the identification process, where those advances are unknown to laypersons?
Further, the Superior Court’s order affirming the judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for further consideration in light of Commonwealth v. Walker, 625 Pa. 450, 92 A.3d 766 (2014). In all [353]*353other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Selenski, 100 A.3d 206, 627 Pa. 352, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2242 (Pa. 2014).
100 A.3d 206 (Commonwealth v. Selenski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Com. v. Selenski, H.
2020 Pa. Super. 22 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020)
Commonwealth v. Pi Delta Psi, Inc.
211 A.3d 875 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)
Commonwealth v. Selenski
158 A.3d 102 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)