Commonwealth v. Selenski

100 A.3d 206
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 29, 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 100 A.3d 206 (Commonwealth v. Selenski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Selenski, 100 A.3d 206 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO Petitioner’s first issue, as stated by Petitioner:

Does the constitutional right to present a defense include the right to offer proven science bearing on the understanding of human memory and perception, and police practices in the identification process, where those advances are unknown to laypersons?

Further, the Superior Court’s order affirming the judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for further consideration in light of Commonwealth v. Walker, — Pa. -, 92 A.3d 766 (2014). In all other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. v. Selenski, H.
2020 Pa. Super. 22 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020)
Commonwealth v. Selenski
117 A.3d 1283 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.3d 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-selenski-pa-2014.