Commonwealth v. Santiago

959 A.2d 909, 598 Pa. 609, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2002
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 3, 2008·No. Appeal No. 76 EM 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, is GRANTED. The issues are as follows:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in concluding that Petitioner’s brief filed in that court failed to comply with the requirements for an Anders1 brief?
(2) Do the requirements set forth by the Superior Court for an Anders brief extend beyond those set by the United States Supreme Court and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court?

[610]*610The Petition Requesting Permission to Withdraw as Counsel, filed by John Martin Belli, Esquire, is GRANTED.

Justice GREENSPAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Santiago, 959 A.2d 909, 598 Pa. 609, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2002 (Pa. 2008).

959 A.2d 909 (Commonwealth v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Santiago
978 A.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)