Commonwealth v. Santiago
959 A.2d 909
This text of 959 A.2d 909 (Commonwealth v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Santiago, 959 A.2d 909 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, is GRANTED. The issues are as follows:
(1) Did the Superior Court err in concluding that Petitioner’s brief filed in that court failed to comply with the requirements for an Anders1 brief?
(2) Do the requirements set forth by the Superior Court for an Anders brief extend beyond those set by the United States Supreme Court and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court?
The Petition Requesting Permission to Withdraw as Counsel, filed by John Martin Belli, Esquire, is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Santiago
978 A.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
959 A.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-santiago-pa-2008.