Commonwealth v. Price
This text of 454 A.2d 1139 (Commonwealth v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lynus Price entered a plea of guilty to robbery and was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment for not less than seven (7) nor more than twenty (20) years. A petition to reconsider sentence was filed and denied, but no direct appeal was taken. Thereafter, Price filed a P.C.H.A. petition. Counsel was appointed, and an amended P.C.H.A. petition was also prepared and filed. When it was denied without hearing, this appeal followed. We are constrained to reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
The amended P.C.H.A. petition alleged, inter alia, that trial counsel had been ineffective (1) in misleading appellant about a promised sentence; (2) in failing to file a motion to withdraw the plea of guilty on grounds that it had been induced by an unfulfilled promise that appellant would receive a sentence of two to five years; and (3) in failing to protect and preserve appellant’s right of allocution at the time of sentencing. Because these averments were of arguable merit, they required an evidentiary hearing.1 It follows that the trial court erred when it dismissed appellant’s P.C.H.A. petition without a hearing.
Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 A.2d 1139, 309 Pa. Super. 174, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-price-pasuperct-1983.