Commonwealth v. Piper

289 A.2d 193, 221 Pa. Super. 187, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1500
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 24, 1972·No. Appeal, 630·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed, and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as she may be there called, and that she be by that court committed until she has complied with the sentence, or any part thereof which has not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Piper, 289 A.2d 193, 221 Pa. Super. 187, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1500 (Pa. Ct. App. 1972).

289 A.2d 193 (Commonwealth v. Piper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Langley
265 N.W.2d 718 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Duncan
363 A.2d 803 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Piper
328 A.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Commonwealth v. Piper
289 A.2d 193 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)