Commonwealth v. Pasture

37 A.3d 1174, 614 Pa. 333, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 163
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 24, 2012·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court VACATED, and the matter REMANDED to that court for consideration of the issue in light of Commonwealth v. Perry, 32 A.3d 232 (Pa.2011) (sentence can be overturned only if it results from manifest unreasonableness, partiality, bias, ill-will, or such lack of support so as to be clearly erroneous). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice SAYLOR files a Dissenting Statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Pasture, 37 A.3d 1174, 614 Pa. 333, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 163 (Pa. 2012).

37 A.3d 1174 (Commonwealth v. Pasture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Pasture
107 A.3d 21 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Rigg
84 A.3d 1080 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Cartrette
83 A.3d 1030 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)