Commonwealth v. Maxwell

569 A.2d 328, 524 Pa. 53, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 422
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 21, 1989·No. Appeal No. 8 Middle District Appeal Docket 1987·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It being brought to the attention of this Court that, on August 20, 1989, the Appellant escaped from the State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, the appeal is dismissed. See, Commonwealth v. Passaro, 504 Pa. 611, 476 A.2d 346 (1984).

STOUT, Former Justice, did not participate in the decision of this case. ZAPPALA, J., dissents.

AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 1990, the Application for Reconsideration or Reargument filed by Appellant is DENIED.

NIX, C.J., files a dissenting statement. ZAPPALA, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Maxwell, 569 A.2d 328, 524 Pa. 53, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 422 (Pa. 1989).

569 A.2d 328 (Commonwealth v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Maxwell, E.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Commonwealth v. Woods
663 A.2d 803 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
In the Interest of J.J.
656 A.2d 1355 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Little
614 A.2d 1146 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Commonwealth v. Brown
578 A.2d 461 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)