Commonwealth v. Keenan
This text of 184 A.2d 793 (Commonwealth v. Keenan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Commonwealth
v.
Keenan, Appellant.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
*2 Before RHODES, P.J., WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (ERVIN, J., absent).
*3 I. Raymond Kremer, for appellant.
Burton Satzberg, Assistant District Attorney, with him Louis F. McCabe, and Arlen Specter, Assistant District Attorneys, Paul M. Chalfin, First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, September 13, 1962:
The sentence of the Court of Quarter Sessions of the Peace of Philadelphia County is affirmed on the opinion of Judge DOTY, for the court below, reported at 28 Pa. D. & C. 2d 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 A.2d 793, 199 Pa. Super. 1, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-keenan-pasuperct-1962.