Commonwealth v. Johnson
791 A.2d 1152
This text of 791 A.2d 1152 (Commonwealth v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Johnson, 791 A.2d 1152 (Pa. 2002).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:
1) Where Petitioner requests to withdraw his guilty plea before sentenc[1153]*1153ing, clearly professes his innocence, and the underlying facts indicate a reasonable basis upon which Petitioner is not guilty as a matter of law, and the Commonwealth introduces no evidence of prejudice, does the trial court abuse its discretion and commit an error of law in refusing to allow Petitioner to withdraw his guilty plea?
2) Was the decision of the trial court denying Petitioner’s request to withdraw his guilty plea, which was made before sentencing, an error of law and an abuse of discretion directly contrary to the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Supreme Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Forbes, 450 Pa. 185, 299 A.2d 268 (1973), and Commonwealth v. Randolph, 553 Pa. 224, 718 A.2d 1242 (1998)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Randolph
718 A.2d 1242 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Commonwealth v. Forbes
299 A.2d 268 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
791 A.2d 1152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-johnson-pa-2002.