Commonwealth v. James

19 A. 950, 135 Pa. 480, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1208
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 2, 1890·No. No. 385·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It is too plain for argument that the appellant, who is the clerk of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Luzerne county, had no right to decline to receive and record the resolutions of the school boards of Wilkes-Barre accepting the provisions of the act of May 23, 1889, P. L. 274. The act referred to requires him to receive and record these papers; his duties were purely ministerial, and the court below properly awarded the per[483]*483emptory mandamus. It is but just to say that his act in refusing does not appear to have been one of insubordination, but was intended to test tbe constitutionality of the said act of 1889. We are of opinion that the constitutional question cannot be raised in this way. We really have no case before us, beyond the mere refusal of the clerk to file the papers. This does not require discussion.

The order of the court below awarding the peremptory mandamus is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. James, 19 A. 950, 135 Pa. 480, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1208 (Pa. 1890).

19 A. 950 (Commonwealth v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Department of Health v. Hanes
78 A.3d 676 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. Anderson
380 A.2d 1032 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Sloan
52 Pa. D. & C.2d 283 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Booz v. Reed
13 Pa. D. & C.2d 283 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1957)
Tanenbaum v. D'Ascenzo
51 A.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Mallet v. Harper
185 S.E. 798 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele
232 N.W. 737 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of State
1910 OK 165 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. Mathues
210 Pa. 372 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)