Commonwealth v. J. B. Lippincott Co.
27 A. 10, 156 Pa. 513, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1378
Opinion
This case appears to be ruled by Commonwealth v. William Mann Company, 150 Pa. 64, and is affirmed on the opinion of the learned trial judge, sustaining defendant’s sixth exception to his former adjudication.
The apparent power “ of dealing in books, maps and periodicals, stationery and other like articles,” found in defendant company’s charter, is void, and may therefore be treated as eliminated. That being done the company must be considered as exclusively organized for manufacturing purposes.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. J. B. Lippincott Co., 27 A. 10, 156 Pa. 513, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1378 (Pa. 1893).
27 A. 10 (Commonwealth v. J. B. Lippincott Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
FDR Publications v. City of Allentown
13 Pa. D. & C.4th 88 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)
City of Williamsport v. Sun-Gazette Co.
553 A.2d 525 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Bindex Corp. v. City of Pittsburgh
475 A.2d 1320 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh
377 A.2d 839 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
City of Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh Press Co.
322 A.2d 390 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Heidelberg Central, Inc. v. Director of Department of Revenue
476 S.W.2d 502 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1972)
Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of Boston
71 N.E.2d 874 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)