Commonwealth v. Holt

121 Mass. 61, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 283
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 24, 1876·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The positions of the defendant’s counsel are untenable. The thirteenth article of the Declaration of Eights, as to the verification of facts in the vicinity where they happen, does not prevent the proof, by competent evidence, of facts [63] occurring abroad, which are material to sustain a prosecution here for a crime committed here. The marriage of the defendant might be proved by his admission of the fact, or by general repute. Gen. Sts. c. 106, § 22. His statement that he had a wife in England, and his inquiry as to the effect of getting a divorce from her, were sufficient evidence against him that she was still alive. His speaking of another woman, living in his house, as his wife, was sufficient evidence that he was cohabiting with her as such. It does not appear that the officer held out any such threats or inducements as to make the defendant’s admissions incompetent evidence. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Holt, 121 Mass. 61, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 283 (Mass. 1876).

121 Mass. 61 (Commonwealth v. Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Kimball
73 N.E.2d 468 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Spencer v. State
1917 OK CR 203 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1917)
State v. Moore
105 P. 293 (Utah Supreme Court, 1909)
People v. Rivera
7 P.R. 325 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1904)
Pueblo v. Rivera
7 P.R. Dec. 332 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1904)
Lauderdale Peerage Claim
17 Abb. N. Cas. 439 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)