Commonwealth v. Holloway

780 A.2d 604, 566 Pa. 236, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Holloway. Read the opinion of the Court — 559 Pa. 258
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 5, 2001·No. Petition No. 263 WAL 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2001, as it appears that at trial, petitioner was pro se with stand-by counsel; and subsequent to trial, new counsel was appointed to represent [237]*237petitioner in his appeal to the Superior Court; and that appeal resulted in an affirmance of the judgment of sentence, and

Pa. R.Crim. P. 122(C)(3), formerly 316(c)(iii) requires that: “Where counsel has been assigned, such assignment shall be effective until final judgment, including any proceedings upon direct appeal,”

THEREFORE, petitioner’s counsel, appointed in connection with his appeal to Superior Court, is directed to proceed in accordance with the Rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Holloway, 780 A.2d 604, 566 Pa. 236, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1899 (Pa. 2001).

780 A.2d 604 (Commonwealth v. Holloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.