Commonwealth v. Holloway
This text of 780 A.2d 604 (Commonwealth v. Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2001, as it appears that at trial, petitioner was pro se with stand-by counsel; and subsequent to trial, new counsel was appointed to represent petitioner in his appeal to the Superior Court; and that appeal resulted in an affirmance of the judgment of sentence, and
Pa. R.Crim. P. 122(C)(3), formerly 316(c)(iii) requires that: “Where counsel has been assigned, such assignment shall be effective until final judgment, including any proceedings upon direct appeal,”
THEREFORE, petitioner’s counsel, appointed in connection with his appeal to Superior Court, is directed to proceed in accordance with the Rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
780 A.2d 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-holloway-pa-2001.