Commonwealth v. Holland

437 A.2d 1159, 496 Pa. 514, 1981 Pa. LEXIS 1111
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 17, 1981·No. 80-3-542·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and sentenced to five to ten years imprisonment. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed. Commonwealth v. Holland, 480 Pa. 202, 389 A.2d 1026 (1978). Thereafter, appellant filed a pro se Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition, which alleged that he was indigent and which requested counsel. Without determining whether appellant was indigent and without appointing counsel, the PCHA court ordered the petition summarily dismissed. This direct appeal followed.

This Court has held that a petitioner, if indigent, has the right to have counsel assist him with his first PCHA petition. Pa.R.Crim.P. 1503(a) and 15041; Commonwealth v. [516]*516Lee, 494 Pa. 216, 431 A.2d 226 (1981); Commonwealth v. McClinton, 488 Pa. 598, 413 A.2d 386 (1980). Although section 12 of the PCHA (19 P.S. § 1180-12 [Supp. 1981-82]) provides for summary disposition without appointment of counsel if “. . . petitioner’s claim is patently frivolous and without trace of support in the record... ”, section 12 has been suspended in part and superseded insofar as it is inconsistent with Pa.R.Crim.P. 1503(a) and 1504. See Commonwealth v. Blair, 470 Pa. 598, 369 A.2d 1153 (1977). The Commonwealth’s assertion that “appointment of counsel. . . would have added no strength to the allegations in the petition” is without merit. The appointment of counsel in post-conviction proceedings sharpens presentation of the issues and promotes the administration of justice. See Commonwealth v. Carrier, 494 Pa. 305, 431 A.2d 271 (1981); Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 427 Pa. 395, 235 A.2d 148 (1967).

Consequently, the order of the PCHA Court is vacated and the case is remanded. If appellant is found to be indigent, counsel must be appointed and must have an opportunity to file an amended petition before any summary disposition can be made.

ROBERTS, J., filed a concurring opinion in which WILKINSON, J., joined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Holland, 437 A.2d 1159, 496 Pa. 514, 1981 Pa. LEXIS 1111 (Pa. 1981).

437 A.2d 1159 (Commonwealth v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Kaufmann
592 A.2d 691 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Commonwealth v. Albert
561 A.2d 736 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Harris
553 A.2d 428 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Rauser
532 A.2d 1191 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Commonwealth v. Keeney
532 A.2d 33 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Commonwealth v. Brown
492 A.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Commonwealth v. O'Nealel
461 A.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Holland
437 A.2d 1159 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)