Commonwealth v. Hershman

97 A.2d 777, 374 Pa. 311, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 398
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 26, 1953
StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.2d 777 (Commonwealth v. Hershman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Hershman, 97 A.2d 777, 374 Pa. 311, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 398 (Pa. 1953).

Opinion

374 Pa. 311 (1953)

Commonwealth
v.
Hershman, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 25, 1953.
June 26, 1953.

Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY and MUSMANNO, JJ.

*312 James P. McArdle, with him Paul J. McArdle, for appellant.

Harry Estep, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, with him Charles D. Coll, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Robert E. Woodside, Attorney General, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, June 26, 1953:

The court being equally divided, the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the Superior Court, reported in 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 134, 90 A. 2d 314.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Hershman
90 A.2d 314 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Hershman
374 Pa. 311 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.2d 777, 374 Pa. 311, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hershman-pa-1953.