Commonwealth v. Hershberger

946 A.2d 681
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 8, 2008·No. 14 WAP 2007. No. 15 WAP 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*682 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2008, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court with the direction to REMAND to the Court of Common Pleas of Bedford County for evidentiary hearings, if necessary, to determine the responsibility for the absence of transcripts from the record certified for appeal. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to the failure of Appellant to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the October 24, 2006 order of the Superior Court shall be reinstated. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to court personnel, the Superior Court shall resolve on the merits the issues raised in the appeal, which were previously treated as waived. See Commonwealth v. Barge, 560 Pa. 179, 743 A.2d 429 (1999). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Hershberger, 946 A.2d 681 (Pa. 2008).

946 A.2d 681 (Commonwealth v. Hershberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
963 A.2d 901 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)