Commonwealth v. Hershberger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hershberger

946 A.2d 681

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 8, 2008

Docket14 WAP 2007. No. 15 WAP 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 946 A.2d 681 (Commonwealth v. Hershberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hershberger, 946 A.2d 681 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*682 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2008, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court with the direction to REMAND to the Court of Common Pleas of Bedford County for evidentiary hearings, if necessary, to determine the responsibility for the absence of transcripts from the record certified for appeal. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to the failure of Appellant to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the October 24, 2006 order of the Superior Court shall be reinstated. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to court personnel, the Superior Court shall resolve on the merits the issues raised in the appeal, which were previously treated as waived. See Commonwealth v. Barge, 560 Pa. 179, 743 A.2d 429 (1999). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*682 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2008, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court with the direction to REMAND to the Court of Common Pleas of Bedford County for evidentiary hearings, if necessary, to determine the responsibility for the absence of transcripts from the record certified for appeal. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to the failure of Appellant to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the October 24, 2006 order of the Superior Court shall be reinstated. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to court personnel, the Superior Court shall resolve on the merits the issues raised in the appeal, which were previously treated as waived. See Commonwealth v. Barge, 560 Pa. 179, 743 A.2d 429 (1999). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

946 A.2d 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hershberger-pa-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack