Commonwealth v. Hershberger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hershberger

929 A.2d 639, 593 Pa. 330, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1514

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Hershberger. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 A.2d 681 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 26, 2007·No. Appeal 606 & 607 WAL 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Shall an appeal be quashed for want of a complete record where the docket of the Clerk of Courts reflects a necessary transcript was requested and sent, but in fact was not transmitted?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Shall an appeal be quashed for want of a complete record where the docket of the Clerk of Courts reflects a necessary transcript was requested and sent, but in fact was not transmitted?

Commonwealth v. Hershberger, 929 A.2d 639, 593 Pa. 330, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1514 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

929 A.2d 639 (Commonwealth v. Hershberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.