Commonwealth v. Harris

131 Mass. 336, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 250
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 29, 1881·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Morton, J.

In a prosecution for rape, the character of the woman for chastity is involved in the issue, and may be impeached by general evidence of her reputation, but particular instances of criminal connection with other persons than the defendant are inadmissible. 3 Greenl. Ev. § 214, and cases cited. Commonwealth v. Regan, 105 Mass. 593. Commonwealth v. O’Brien, 119 Mass. 342. In the case at bar, the defendant offered evidence to show, not the general character of the woman, but particular instances of un chastity with persons other than himself. The court rightly rejected the evidence.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Harris, 131 Mass. 336, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 250 (Mass. 1881).

131 Mass. 336 (Commonwealth v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

COMMONWEALTH v. GUSTAVO GONZALEZ SANTOS.
100 Mass. App. Ct. 1 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2021)
Commonwealth v. Harris
825 N.E.2d 58 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2005)
Commonwealth v. Gardner
216 N.E.2d 558 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1966)
Commonwealth v. Dies
248 Mass. 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Cotting
248 Mass. 401 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Duff
139 N.E. 351 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
State v. Brand
145 N.W. 39 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
State v. Apley
141 N.W. 740 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)
State v. Ogden
65 P. 449 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1901)
Brown v. State
72 Miss. 997 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1895)
Miller v. Curtis
32 N.E. 1039 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
State v. Campbell
17 P. 620 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1888)
Wilson v. State
17 Tex. Ct. App. 525 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)