Commonwealth v. Grasso

399 N.E.2d 47, 9 Mass. App. Ct. 832, 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 985
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided January 22, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant appeals from his conviction of unlawfully distributing a controlled substance. As the facts of this case are indistinguishable in principle from those of Commonwealth v. Ennis, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 499 (1973), it was error for the judge to deny the defendant the name of the informant who had accompanied the undercover police officer to the meeting with the drug seller and who was clearly in a position to make an in-court identification of the seller.

Judgment reversed.

Verdict set aside.

Hugh W. Samson for the defendant. Kevin Connelly, Assistant District Attorney (Michael J. Traft, Assistant District Attorney, with him) for the Commonwealth.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Grasso, 399 N.E.2d 47, 9 Mass. App. Ct. 832, 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 985 (Mass. Ct. App. 1980).

399 N.E.2d 47 (Commonwealth v. Grasso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Taliceo
430 N.E.2d 1220 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Grasso
411 N.E.2d 191 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)