Commonwealth v. Giles

343 A.2d 355, 463 Pa. 88, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 923
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 7, 1975·No. Appeal Nos. 457 and 516·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, EAGEN and O’BRIEN, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. [89]*89POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Giles, 343 A.2d 355, 463 Pa. 88, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 923 (Pa. 1975).

343 A.2d 355 (Commonwealth v. Giles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Wright
578 A.2d 513 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Commonwealth v. Lindenmuth
554 A.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Thompson
484 A.2d 159 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Ferguson
432 A.2d 1103 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Lee
396 A.2d 724 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Clawson
378 A.2d 1008 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Batson v. State
568 P.2d 973 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Cameron
372 A.2d 904 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Kishbach
373 A.2d 118 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Jones
363 A.2d 1281 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)