Commonwealth v. Garzone
6 A.3d 499, 607 Pa. 324, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2375
This text of 6 A.3d 499 (Commonwealth v. Garzone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Garzone, 6 A.3d 499, 607 Pa. 324, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2375 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of October 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in removing the cost of employing county detectives and assistant district attorneys from the trial court’s discretion to impose prosecution expenses on a convicted offender?
The Petition of Respondent Gerald Gar-zone seeking consolidation of his action with that of his brother and Co-Respondent, Louis Garzone, is also GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Garzone
6 A.3d 500 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 A.3d 499, 607 Pa. 324, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-garzone-pa-2010.