Commonwealth v. Fields
This text of 421 A.2d 1051 (Commonwealth v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
On June 4, 1979, appellant Harold Fields was brought to trial before a jury on one count each of murder of the first degree, murder of the third degree, voluntary manslaughter, carrying a firearm without a license, and former convict owning a firearm. Three days into the trial, the court, upon motion by appellant, declared a mistrial. On September 11, 1979, appellant filed an Application to Dismiss Indictments on the grounds that a new trial would violate his right not to be twice placed in jeopardy. The trial court denied the application and this direct appeal followed.1
[611]*611Appellant’s double jeopardy claim is based on the contention that appellant was forced to request a mistrial because of misconduct on the part of the prosecutor. We have reviewed the record and find this contention to be without merit.
Accordingly, the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Application to Dismiss Indictments is affirmed and the case is remanded for appropriate proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 A.2d 1051, 491 Pa. 609, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-fields-pa-1980.