Commonwealth v. Esser

307 A.2d 362, 224 Pa. Super. 539, 1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1952
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 14, 1973·No. Appeal, No. 297·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Although the appellant has proceeded in propria persona in this appeal from the denial of his Post Conviction Hearing Act1 petition, after becoming dissatis[540]*540fied with the sufficiency of Ms court-appointed attorney’s representation, the record as presently constituted does not permit a determination as to whether he has intelligently and understandingly waived Ms right to free and competent appellate counsel in these proceedings. Consequently, the case is remanded to the Court of Common Plas of Luzerne County for a determination, by hearing or otherwise, of that issue and for such action as may he required to protect appellant’s right to competent and expeditious representation on appeal. Commonwealth v. Cooney, 439 Pa. 324, 266 A. 2d 650 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Esser, 307 A.2d 362, 224 Pa. Super. 539, 1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1952 (Pa. Ct. App. 1973).

307 A.2d 362 (Commonwealth v. Esser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Cooney
266 A.2d 650 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)