Commonwealth v. Esser
This text of 307 A.2d 362 (Commonwealth v. Esser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
Although the appellant has proceeded in propria persona in this appeal from the denial of his Post Conviction Hearing Act1 petition, after becoming dissatis[540]*540fied with the sufficiency of Ms court-appointed attorney’s representation, the record as presently constituted does not permit a determination as to whether he has intelligently and understandingly waived Ms right to free and competent appellate counsel in these proceedings. Consequently, the case is remanded to the Court of Common Plas of Luzerne County for a determination, by hearing or otherwise, of that issue and for such action as may he required to protect appellant’s right to competent and expeditious representation on appeal. Commonwealth v. Cooney, 439 Pa. 324, 266 A. 2d 650 (1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 A.2d 362, 224 Pa. Super. 539, 1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-esser-pasuperct-1973.