Commonwealth v. Eisen

334 N.E.2d 14, 368 Mass. 813, 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1095
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 334 N.E.2d 14 (Commonwealth v. Eisen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Eisen, 334 N.E.2d 14, 368 Mass. 813, 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1095 (Mass. 1975).

Opinion

The defendant died following the argument of this appeal under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. Earlier convictions arising out of the same events were considered in Commonwealth v. Eisen, 358 Mass. 740 (1971), and Eisen v. Picard, 452 F. 2d 860 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. den. 406 U. S. 950 (1972). Thereafter the defendant was retried, and he has brought this appeal from a conviction of murder in the second degree. When a criminal defendant dies pending his appeal, normally the judgment should be vacated and the indictment dismissed. This is the general practice [814]*814elsewhere. Durham v. United States, 401 U. S. 481 (1971). State v. Carter, 299 Atl. 2d 891 (Maine 1973). State v. Marzilli, 111 R. I. 392 (1973). The asserted general importance of certain issues and counsel’s able presentation of his client’s appeal do not justify a different result. Any personal interest in vindication which a member of the defendant’s family may have is not sufficiently substantial to warrant our deciding the appeal. Cf. St. Pierre v. United States, 319 U. S. 41 (1943); Wetzel v. Ohio, 371 U. S. 62, 65 (1962) (Douglas, J., concurring). Although given an opportunity to do so, neither the Commonwealth nor the defendant’s counsel has advanced any other reason why a decision on this appeal should be made. The matter of counsel fees will be decided by a single justice of this court.

P. J. Piscitelli (Robert E. Klein with him) for the defendant. Helen Murphy Doona, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Judgment on indictment No. 41052 vacated; the case is remanded to the Superior Court where that indictment shall be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Hernandez
118 N.E.3d 107 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2019)
State v. Burrell
837 N.W.2d 459 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2013)
Commonwealth v. Latour
493 N.E.2d 500 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1986)
Commonwealth v. Harris
398 N.E.2d 726 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Strother
378 N.E.2d 958 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
State v. Blake
371 N.E.2d 843 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1977)
State v. Gomes
554 P.2d 235 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 N.E.2d 14, 368 Mass. 813, 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-eisen-mass-1975.