Commonwealth v. Dick
951 A.2d 260, 597 Pa. 228, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Dick. Read the opinion of the Court — 602 Pa. 180 →
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 23, 2008·No. Petition Nos. 548 CAP and 7 EM 2008·Published
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2008, the Petition to Allow Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc and the Petition to Allow Filing of Post Sentence Motion Nunc Pro Tunc are hereby DENIED. This denial does not impact Appellant’s right to file a brief discussing issues that this Court analyzes in an automatic direct appeal from a sentence of death, see Commonwealth v. Appel, 517 Pa. 529, 539 A.2d 780, 781 (1988); Commonwealth v. Graham, 541 Pa. 173, 661 A.2d 1367 (1995), or issues that were properly preserved below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Dick, 951 A.2d 260, 597 Pa. 228, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 969 (Pa. 2008).
951 A.2d 260 (Commonwealth v. Dick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Graham
661 A.2d 1367 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Appel
539 A.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)