Commonwealth v. Dick

951 A.2d 260
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 23, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 951 A.2d 260 (Commonwealth v. Dick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Dick, 951 A.2d 260 (Pa. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2008, the Petition to Allow Appeal Nunc Pro [261]*261Tunc and the Petition to Allow Filing of Post Sentence Motion Nunc Pro Tunc are hereby DENIED. This denial does not impact Appellant’s right to file a brief discussing issues that this Court analyzes in an automatic direct appeal from a sentence of death, sec Commonwealth v. Appel, 517 Pa. 529, 539 A.2d 780, 781 (1988); Commonwealth v. Graham, 541 Pa. 173, 661 A.2d 1367 (1995), or issues that were properly preserved below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Graham
661 A.2d 1367 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Appel
539 A.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 A.2d 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-dick-pa-2008.