Commonwealth v. Dick

951 A.2d 260
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 23, 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2008, the Petition to Allow Appeal Nunc Pro [261] Tunc and the Petition to Allow Filing of Post Sentence Motion Nunc Pro Tunc are hereby DENIED. This denial does not impact Appellant’s right to file a brief discussing issues that this Court analyzes in an automatic direct appeal from a sentence of death, sec Commonwealth v. Appel, 517 Pa. 529, 539 A.2d 780, 781 (1988); Commonwealth v. Graham, 541 Pa. 173, 661 A.2d 1367 (1995), or issues that were properly preserved below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Dick, 951 A.2d 260 (Pa. 2008).

951 A.2d 260 (Commonwealth v. Dick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Graham
661 A.2d 1367 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Appel
539 A.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)