Commonwealth v. Cobbs, J., Aplt.
This text of Commonwealth v. Cobbs, J., Aplt. (Commonwealth v. Cobbs, J., Aplt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[J-16-2021][M.O. – Baer, C.J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 56 MAP 2020 : Appellee : Appeal from the Judgment of Superior : Court dated 2/24/20 at No. 3339 EDA : 2018 affirming the PCRA Order of the v. : Montgomery County Court of Common : Pleas, Criminal Division, dated 10/23/18 : at No. CP-46-CR-287-1979 : JAMES HENRY COBBS, : : Appellant : SUBMITTED: January 22, 2021
CONCURRING OPINION
JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: August 17, 2021
I join the majority opinion, except for its conclusion that Appellant’s claim that his
conviction and sentence were invalid under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S. Ct.
2455 (2012), and Mongtomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. 190, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016),
satisfies the Post Conviction Relief Act’s eligibility criterion relating to constitutional
violations or violations of laws of the United States which “so undermined the truth-
determining process that no reliable adjudication of guilt or innocence could have taken
place.” Majority Opinion, slip op. at 27 (quoting 42 Pa.C.S. §9543(a)(2)(i)).
My difficulty is with conceptualizing that the Pennsylvania General Assembly
would have contemplated a retroactive application of the United States Supreme
Court’s Eighth Amendment evolving-norms jurisprudence as impacting on the truth-
determining process. To me, it would be more straightforward to couch the impediment as a legal one being retroactively imposed under the transformed federal jurisprudence
and to apply the rationale of Commonwealth v. Lantzy, 558 Pa. 214, 736 A.2d 564
(1999), to support eligibility. See id. at 222-25, 736 A.2d at 569-70 (reconciling the
PCRA’s competing objectives to channel the gamut of collateral challenges to
judgments of sentence through the statutory scheme versus the apparent aim to narrow
the classes of cases that could be considered in favor of a broader, non-textual
approach to eligibility).
[J-16-2021][M.O. – Baer, C.J.] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Cobbs, J., Aplt., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cobbs-j-aplt-pa-2021.