Commonwealth v. Chandler
11 Mass. 83
Opinion
It appearing, by the return of the respondent, that the person was not in his custody, nor within his control, at the time of the service, the writ is without effect. It will be time enough to hear evidence of facts in the case when the party is brought before us. Until then, we can take no order upon the subject. The return must be taken for true,
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Chandler, 11 Mass. 83 (Mass. 1814).
11 Mass. 83 (Commonwealth v. Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vautier
164 N.E.2d 317 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1960)
Ex parte Soldini
4 P.R. 304 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1903)
King's Case
36 N.E. 685 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Ex parte Shaudies
66 Ala. 134 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
In re Lampert
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 154 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Supervisors of Jackson Co. v. Leonard
16 W. Va. 470 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1880)
Ex parte Benedict
3 F. Cas. 159 (N.D. New York, 1862)
Ex parte Coupland
1 Robards 5 (Texas Supreme Court, 1862)
Taylor v. Browder
1 Ohio St. (N.S.) 225 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1853)
Clark v. Bush
3 Cow. 151 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)
Merrill v. Merrill
15 Mass. 487 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)