Commonwealth v. Cameron
79 A. 169, 229 Pa. 592, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 538
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1911·No. Appeal, No. 95·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
We concur in the conclusion reached by the Superior Court, that sec. 32, art. Ill, of the constitution is restrictive only of the use of the testimony actually given by a witness under compulsion and that it does not confer immunity from prosecution for an offense in relation to which a witness has been compelled to testify. We affirm the judgment on the opinion of the learned president judge of that court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Cameron, 79 A. 169, 229 Pa. 592, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 1911).
79 A. 169 (Commonwealth v. Cameron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huyett v. Reading
34 Pa. D. & C.2d 193 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1964)
Brown v. State
196 A.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Schwinger Appeal
124 A.2d 133 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Commonwealth v. Butler
90 A.2d 838 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Haines
90 A.2d 842 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Schultz
87 A.2d 69 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
In re Plotkin Contempt
78 Pa. D. & C. 529 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)
Commonwealth v. Frank
48 A.2d 10 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Commonwealth v. Jacobs
45 Pa. D. & C. 113 (Lancaster County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1942)
Com. Ex Rel. Paige v. Smith, Warden
198 A. 812 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
In Re Adjudication of Contempt of Myers
83 Pa. Super. 383 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Shields
50 Pa. Super. 194 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)