Commonwealth v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Cameron

79 A. 169, 229 Pa. 592, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 538

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 3, 1911

DocketAppeal, No. 95

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 79 A. 169 (Commonwealth v. Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Cameron, 79 A. 169, 229 Pa. 592, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We concur in the conclusion reached by the Superior Court, that sec. 32, art. Ill, of the constitution is restrictive only of the use of the testimony actually given by a witness under compulsion and that it does not confer immunity from prosecution for an offense in relation to which a witness has been compelled to testify. We affirm the judgment on the opinion of the learned president judge of that court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We concur in the conclusion reached by the Superior Court, that sec. 32, art. Ill, of the constitution is restrictive only of the use of the testimony actually given by a witness under compulsion and that it does not confer immunity from prosecution for an offense in relation to which a witness has been compelled to testify. We affirm the judgment on the opinion of the learned president judge of that court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A. 169, 229 Pa. 592, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cameron-pa-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack