Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. Caldwell

Commonwealth v. Caldwell

550 A.2d 785, 520 Pa. 69, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 340
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 30, 1988·No. 35 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1986·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, to wit, this 30th day of November, 1988, the Commonwealth’s Application for Reargument is denied.

[70]*70STOUT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this Application for Reargument. NIX, C.J., filed a concurring statement in which FLAHERTY, J., joined. PAPADAKOS, J., filed a concurring statement. LARSEN, J., dissents and would grant the Commonwealth’s Application for Reargument. McDERMOTT, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Caldwell, 550 A.2d 785, 520 Pa. 69, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 340 (Pa. 1988).

550 A.2d 785 (Commonwealth v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Brown
711 A.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Commonwealth v. Stevens
670 A.2d 623 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Commonwealth v. Fahy
645 A.2d 199 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Commonwealth v. Karabin
559 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Caldwell
550 A.2d 785 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)