Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. Byrd

Commonwealth v. Byrd

391 A.2d 677, 258 Pa. Super. 590, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4028
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 12, 1978
DocketAppeal, No. 520
StatusPublished

This text of 391 A.2d 677 (Commonwealth v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Byrd, 391 A.2d 677, 258 Pa. Super. 590, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4028 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J.,

would remand for an evidentiary hearing on counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness pursuant to Commonwealth v. Twiggs, 460 Pa. 105, 331 A.2d 440 (1975). See also, Commonwealth v. Aaron, 255 Pa.Super. 289, 386 A.2d 1006 (1978) (Dissenting Opinion by HOFFMAN, J.).

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Twiggs
331 A.2d 440 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Aaron
386 A.2d 1006 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 A.2d 677, 258 Pa. Super. 590, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-byrd-pasuperct-1978.