Commonwealth v. Brown

963 A.2d 900, 600 Pa. 93, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2271

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 Pa. 354 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 12, 2008·No. Petition No. 538 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

[94]*94 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of December 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in finding that Medicare is a government agency which is entitled to restitution pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 1106, because it paid a medical provider for services to the victim, but did not compensate the victim in a monetary fashion?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[94]*94 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of December 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in finding that Medicare is a government agency which is entitled to restitution pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 1106, because it paid a medical provider for services to the victim, but did not compensate the victim in a monetary fashion?

Commonwealth v. Brown, 963 A.2d 900, 600 Pa. 93, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2271 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

963 A.2d 900 (Commonwealth v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

§ 1106

Pennsylvania § 1106

Opinion

Related