Commonwealth v. Brown

963 A.2d 900

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 Pa. 354 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 12, 2008·No. 538 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of December 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in finding that Medicare is a government agency which is entitled to restitution pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 1106, because it paid a medical provider for services to the victim, but did not compensate the victim in a monetary fashion?.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of December 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in finding that Medicare is a government agency which is entitled to restitution pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 1106, because it paid a medical provider for services to the victim, but did not compensate the victim in a monetary fashion?.

Commonwealth v. Brown, 963 A.2d 900 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

963 A.2d 900 (Commonwealth v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

§ 1106

Pennsylvania § 1106

Opinion

Related