Commonwealth v. Borris

372 A.2d 459, 247 Pa. Super. 276
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 31, 1977
DocketAppeal No. 665
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 372 A.2d 459 (Commonwealth v. Borris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Borris, 372 A.2d 459, 247 Pa. Super. 276 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

HOFFMAN, Judge:

On March 4, 1976, the lower court certified the instant case to this'Court on a controlling question of law: whether appellant is entitled to relief pursuant to Rule 1100(f), Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S. Appendix. See Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, No. 223, art. V, § 501; 17 P.S. § 211.501(b). The instant case arises out of the same facts addressed in Commonwealth v. Mancuso, 247 Pa.Super. 266, 372 A.2d 454 (filed March 31, 1977; J. 1685 1976); Commonwealth v. Richey, 247 Pa.Super. 274, 372 A.2d 459 (filed March 31, 1977); Commonwealth v. Borris, 247 Pa.Super. 273, 372 A.2d 458 (filed March 31, 1977). Based on our decision in Commonwealth v. Mancuso, supra (J. 1685 1976), we order the charges against appellant be dismissed with prejudice. Rule 1100(f).

VAN der VOORT, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Richey
372 A.2d 459 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 A.2d 459, 247 Pa. Super. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-borris-pasuperct-1977.