Commonwealth v. Bertels
This text of 420 A.2d 404 (Commonwealth v. Bertels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from a reversal by the Superior Court1 of judgments of sentence imposed upon appellees, Norman H. Bertels, Jr., W. Kirk Hammaker, and Donald L. Parker, following convictions for embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, falsification of corporate records, and conspiracy.2 The convictions arose from complex transactions, involving applications of financial assets, whereby the appellees were found to have defrauded corporations which they controlled. Trial by jury was held in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in February, 1969, venue having been changed from Adams County at defendants’ request.
On appeal is the issue of whether Adams County had venue and jurisdiction for trial, since the transactions involved occurred primarily outside that County. After a careful review of the briefs, record, and decisions below, we [189]*189affirm the determination of the Superior Court that trial jurisdiction was lacking.
Order of the Superior Court affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 A.2d 404, 491 Pa. 187, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bertels-pa-1980.