Commonwealth v. Belgrave

391 A.2d 662, 258 Pa. Super. 40, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3036

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The court is unanimous that on the merits the convictions should be affirmed for the reasons stated in Judge CER-CONE’s Concurring and Dissenting Opinion. However, JACOBS, P. J., and HOFFMAN, PRICE and SPAETH, JJ., are of the opinion that the judgment of sentence should be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing under Commonwealth v. Lockhart, 223 Pa.Super. 60, 296 A.2d 883 (1972).

So ordered.

CERCONE, J., files a Concurring and Dissenting Opinion in which VAN der VOORT, J., joins. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.