Commonwealth v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida

387 A.2d 449, 478 Pa. 532, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 625
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 28, 1978
DocketNo. 62
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 387 A.2d 449 (Commonwealth v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida, 387 A.2d 449, 478 Pa. 532, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 625 (Pa. 1978).

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the Insurance Department of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, charged American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida (American) with a violation of certain provisions of the Pennsylvania insurance laws.1 Following a hearing, American was found to have committed at least 110 violations and was accordingly fined $5500.00.2 On appeal, the Commonwealth Court reversed. The ground of reversal was a lack of procedural due process in the hearing procedures of the Insurance Department which in turn had been caused by insufficient separation of the prosecutorial [534]*534and judicial functions. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Insurance v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, 26 Pa.Cmwlth. 189, 363 A.2d 874 (1976). We allowed the present appeal and now affirm.

The record discloses that one Andrew F. Giffen, Esquire, was Associate General Counsel of the Insurance Department and supervised the office within the department which initiated the present charges. It also appears that he signed and issued the citation charging the violations. Thereafter, Mr. Giffen was appointed a Deputy Insurance Commissioner and presided over the hearing in that capacity. In performing that function he ruled on questions of evidence, resolved questions of fact and drafted the proposed adjudication which was later signed by the Insurance Commissioner. Such a commingling of prosecutorial and adjudicatory functions in one individual offends fundamental notions of due process and is constitutionally impermissible. See Dussia v. Barger, 466 Pa. 152, 351 A.2d 667 (1975).

Order affirmed.

PACKEL, former Justice did not participate in the decision of this case. NIX, J., filed a concurring opinion. ROBERTS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.S. Fadzen, Jr. v. Pittsburgh Public School District
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Romanick v. Rush Township
67 A.3d 62 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. Department of Transportation
860 A.2d 600 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Curran v. Commonwealth, Department of State, Board of Psychology
766 A.2d 907 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)
Hetman v. State Civil Service Commission
714 A.2d 532 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Department of Insurance
636 A.2d 293 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of Medicine
605 A.2d 1204 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
In re Thomasik
5 Pa. D. & C.4th 474 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1989)
McVay v. Zoning Hearing Board
496 A.2d 1328 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Romano v. Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner
404 A.2d 758 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Berman v. Commonwealth
391 A.2d 715 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Com., Dept. of Ins. v. AM. BANKERS INS.
387 A.2d 449 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
387 A.2d 449, 478 Pa. 532, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-american-bankers-insurance-co-of-florida-pa-1978.