Commonwealth ex rel. Fischer v. German Society

15 Pa. 251, 1851 Pa. LEXIS 11
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 25, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 15 Pa. 251 (Commonwealth ex rel. Fischer v. German Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex rel. Fischer v. German Society, 15 Pa. 251, 1851 Pa. LEXIS 11 (Pa. 1851).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

The examination of the authorities cited and the argument of counsel have convinced us the judgment must be reversed and a peremptory mandamus awarded. All the causes of demurrer, with the exception of the fourth, are fully sustained by the cases. The law in this State is the same as in England and our sister States. All that is decided in the Com’th v. The Pike [255]*255Beneficial Society, 8 W. & Ser. 247, and Toram v. The Howard Beneficial Association, 4 Barr 519, is, that we will not reverse the proceedings of a corporation upon the merits, when acting within the powers granted by the charter; and not that the regularity of the proceedings is not open to inquiry. Mr. Justice Sergeant, in 8 W. Ser. 251, explains the true distinction, in language so clear and explicit, that it is surprising it should have been misunderstood: .“The courts entertain a jurisdiction to preserve these tribunals (corporations) in the line of order, and to correct abuses; but they do not inquire into the merits <?f what has passed in rem judicatam, in a regular course of proceedings.” That distinguished judge never intended to interfere, as was strangely supposed, with the well-settled principle that the fact of amotion must be distinctly shown in the return, that the court may judge of its sufficiency, both as to the cause and the form of the proceedings.

Judgment for the Commonwealth, and peremptory mandamus awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of America
161 A.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Medical Soc. of Mobile County v. Walker
16 So. 2d 321 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Lytle v. New Castle Agricultural Ass'n
91 Pa. Super. 152 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Hemphill v. Enterprise Lodge No. 75
66 Pa. Super. 134 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Macavicza v. Workingman's Club
92 A. 41 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Carlin v. Ancient Order of Hibernians
54 Pa. Super. 512 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Crow v. Capital City Council
26 Pa. Super. 411 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Commonwealth v. Union League
19 A. 1030 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Pa. 251, 1851 Pa. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-fischer-v-german-society-pa-1851.