Commonwealth Ex Rel. Dunn v. Ruch

110 A.2d 240, 380 Pa. 152, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 544
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1955
DocketAppeal, 339
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 110 A.2d 240 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Dunn v. Ruch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Dunn v. Ruch, 110 A.2d 240, 380 Pa. 152, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 544 (Pa. 1955).

Opinions

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In 1949, the relator, John W. Dunn, was convicted in the State of Georgia of two crimes of burglary and was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of six years on each offense, the sentences to be served consecutively. He escaped from prison in August, 1951. In January, 1954, he was arrested in Philadelphia and a warrant for his extradition was issued by the Governor of Pennsylvania upon the requisition of the Governor of Georgia. Relator filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he had been subjected to cruel and barbarous treatment during his confinement in Georgia and would again suffer similar treat[154]*154ment if he were returned there; also that he had been, and would again be, unable while in a Georgia prison to communicate with counsel for the purpose of obtaining legal aid in order to perfect an appeal.

At the hearing relator stipulated that the facts in his case were the same as those in Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Baldi, 378 Pa. 504, 106 A. 2d 777, but he stressed his averment of inability to communicate with counsel while confined in Georgia. The court held that, even accepting the averments of his petition to be true, the case was governed by the decision of this court in the Brown case, which held that it could not be assumed that the prison officials in Georgia would unlawfully prevent a returned fugitive from invoking the aid of the local courts and obtaining the assistance of counsel for such purpose. In view of the decision in that case and the authorities there cited, including Sweeney, Sheriff v. Woodall, 344 U.S. 86, the court properly dismissed relator’s petition.

The order dismissing the petition for the writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheriff, Clark County v. Randono
515 P.2d 1267 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
Murray v. Burns
405 P.2d 309 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1965)
State v. Booth
328 P.2d 1104 (Montana Supreme Court, 1958)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Dunn v. Ruch
110 A.2d 240 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.2d 240, 380 Pa. 152, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-dunn-v-ruch-pa-1955.