Commonwealth ex. rel. Bryan v. Pike Beneficial Society

8 Watts & Serg. 247
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 8 Watts & Serg. 247 (Commonwealth ex. rel. Bryan v. Pike Beneficial Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex. rel. Bryan v. Pike Beneficial Society, 8 Watts & Serg. 247 (Pa. 1844).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Sergeant, J.

This case cannot be distinguished from that of White and Blacksmith’s Society v. Vandyke, (2 Whart. 309). The charter to the defendants below provides for the offence, directs the mode of proceeding, and authorizes the society, on conviction of the member, to expel him. This has been done, after a bearing and trial, according to the mode prescribed; at least, there is no allegation of the irregularity of the proceeding. Under these circumstances the sentence is conclusive on the merits, and cannot be inquired into collaterally either by mandamus or action, or in any other mode. It is like an award made by a tribunal of the party’s own choosing; for he became a member under and subject to the articles and conditions of the charter, and, of course, to the provisions on this subject as well as others. The society acted judicially, and its sentence is conclusive, like that of any other judicial tribunal. The courts entertain a jurisdiction to preserve these tribunals in the line of order, and to correct abuses; but they do not inquire into the merits of what has passed in rem judicatam in a regular course of proceedings.

Judgment reversed, and venire facias de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of America
161 A.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Cimprich v. Pennsylvania Railroad
180 A. 51 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Spayd v. Ringing Rock Lodge
74 Pa. Super. 139 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
March v. Fairmount Creamery Ass'n
32 Pa. Super. 517 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Beeman v. Supreme Lodge
64 A. 792 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Brandenburger v. Jefferson Club Ass'n
88 Mo. App. 148 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Myers v. Fritchman
6 Pa. Super. 580 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Commonwealth v. Union League
19 A. 1030 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1890)
Appeal of Sperry
9 A. 478 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887)
Medical & Surgical Society of Montgomery County v. Weatherly
75 Ala. 248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
Society for Visitation of Sick v. Commonwealth ex rel. Meyer
52 Pa. 125 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Watts & Serg. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-bryan-v-pike-beneficial-society-pa-1844.