Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Svejda
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 8:21-CV-311
VS. ORDER TERRY MICHAEL SVEJDA and CENTURION CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ objection (filing 36) to the Magistrate Judge's order (filing 34) resolving the parties’ discovery disputes. A district court may reconsider a magistrate judge's ruling on nondispositive pretrial matters only where it has been shown that the ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Ferguson v. United States, 484 F.3d 1068, 1076 (8th Cir. 2007). The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings, the Magistrate Judge's order, and the parties' briefs, and finds that the Magistrate Judge's order was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See id. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendants’ objection (filing 36) is overruled.
Dated this 8th day of April, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
hn M. Gerrard nited States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Svejda (Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Svejda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.