Commercial Credit Co. v. Williams

87 S.W.2d 499
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 1935
DocketNo. 4735.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 87 S.W.2d 499 (Commercial Credit Co. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commercial Credit Co. v. Williams, 87 S.W.2d 499 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of the One Hundred Twenty-fourth district, Gregg county, Tex., overruling the plea of privilege filed by appellant. Appellee’s suit was for damages, alleging that appellant by and through its agent and representative, A. D. Hamilton, together with other persons named in the petition, residents of Gregg county, Tex., and made parties to the suit, willfully, unlawfully, and without excuse or justification, or authority or warrant of law, went into the private residence of appellee and caused her arrest and restraint, and there committed other acts of violence, to plaintiff’s damage fully and in detail set out in the petition.

Appellant’s brief does’not contain any assignment of error. Article 1844, R. S. 1925, as amended by Acts of the 42d Legislature (1931), p. 117, c. 75, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1844), providing that the appellant may embody in his brief in the appellate court his assignments of error, has been construed tp be mandatory. Lamar-Delta County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 2 v. Dunn (Tex. Civ. App.) 42 S.W. (2d) 872, affirmed (Tex. Com. App.) 61 S.W. (2d) 816, following Lamar-Delta County Improvement District No. 2 v. Gordon (Tex. Com. App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 817; *500 Lamar-Delta County Improvement District No. 2 v. Gordon (Tex. Com. App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 818; rule 23.

Appellant’s brief contains a proposition, but not being based upon any assignment of error, we are not authorized to consider it. Columbian National Fire Insurance Co. v. Dixie Co-op. Mail Order House (Tex. Com. App.) 276 S. W. 219.

We have examined the record and it presents no fundamental error. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. Walter Bennett, Inc.
135 S.W.2d 1073 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Central Power & Light Co. v. Heder
133 S.W.2d 795 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Adams v. Jones
107 S.W.2d 450 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Still v. Moffett
93 S.W.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Anderson v. Welch
92 S.W.2d 1121 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.W.2d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-credit-co-v-williams-texapp-1935.