Commercial Bank of Magee v. Evans

112 So. 482, 145 Miss. 643, 1927 Miss. LEXIS 169
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1927
DocketNo. 26315.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 112 So. 482 (Commercial Bank of Magee v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commercial Bank of Magee v. Evans, 112 So. 482, 145 Miss. 643, 1927 Miss. LEXIS 169 (Mich. 1927).

Opinion

*652 ANdersoN, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first suit was not brought under the statute. If it was intended to be.brought under the statute, there was a failure to comply with the statute. Appellees were not parties to it, and are not bound by the judgment rendered therein.

The statute wrote into Owen’s bond the condition it required to be in there. The statute is mandatory. The obligor and the obligee, as well as the sureties on the bond, are presumed to have known what the statute requires when the bond was executed. The bond having been executed, and having accomplished its purpose, the law will write into the bond what it requires should be written into it. In other words, in the execution of a bond by a contractor to do public work, so far as the condition of the.bond is concerned, the law takes care of that, and makes it what it should be.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Todd Crowley v. Robert G. Germany
268 So. 3d 1277 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2018)
Renasant Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.
882 F.3d 203 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
State ex rel. National Surety Corp. v. Malvaney
72 So. 2d 424 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
STATE, USE OF NATL. S. CORP. v. Malvaney
72 So. 2d 424 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Watts v. Western Cas. & Surety Co.
49 So. 2d 255 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
Franklin Surety Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
165 A. 309 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1933)
Union Indemnity Co. v. Acme Blow Pipe & Sheet Metal Works
117 So. 251 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 So. 482, 145 Miss. 643, 1927 Miss. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commercial-bank-of-magee-v-evans-miss-1927.