Commercial Bank of Magee v. Evans

112 So. 482, 145 Miss. 643, 1927 Miss. LEXIS 169
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1927·No. No. 26315.·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

*652 ANdersoN, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first suit was not brought under the statute. If it was intended to be.brought under the statute, there was a failure to comply with the statute. Appellees were not parties to it, and are not bound by the judgment rendered therein.

The statute wrote into Owen’s bond the condition it required to be in there. The statute is mandatory. The obligor and the obligee, as well as the sureties on the bond, are presumed to have known what the statute requires when the bond was executed. The bond having been executed, and having accomplished its purpose, the law will write into the bond what it requires should be written into it. In other words, in the execution of a bond by a contractor to do public work, so far as the condition of the.bond is concerned, the law takes care of that, and makes it what it should be.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commercial Bank of Magee v. Evans, 112 So. 482, 145 Miss. 643, 1927 Miss. LEXIS 169 (Mich. 1927).

112 So. 482 (Commercial Bank of Magee v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Todd Crowley v. Robert G. Germany
268 So. 3d 1277 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2018)
Renasant Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.
882 F.3d 203 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
State ex rel. National Surety Corp. v. Malvaney
72 So. 2d 424 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
STATE, USE OF NATL. S. CORP. v. Malvaney
72 So. 2d 424 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Watts v. Western Cas. & Surety Co.
49 So. 2d 255 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
Franklin Surety Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
165 A. 309 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1933)
Union Indemnity Co. v. Acme Blow Pipe & Sheet Metal Works
117 So. 251 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)