Comer v. State
This text of 577 So. 2d 686 (Comer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Comer appeals from his conviction and sentence for burglary of an occupied conveyance and robbery. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on flight and that section 775.084, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), is unconstitutional.
The first point was not properly preserved for appeal, and we find no merit in the constitutional challenge. See Smith v. State, 567 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990); Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990); Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990), dismissed, 564 So.2d 488 (Fla.1990); King v. State, 557 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), rev. denied, 564 So.2d 1086 (Fla.1990). Cf. Barber v. State, 564 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
577 So. 2d 686, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3097, 1991 WL 46832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comer-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.