Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. CX360, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware·Decided November 14, 2024·No. 2024-0991-LWW·Published

Opinion

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LORI W. WILL LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734

November 14, 2024

Susan W. Waesco, Esquire Matthew F. Davis, Esquire Thomas P. Will, Esquire David A. Seal, Esquire Courtney Kurz, Esquire Callan R. Jackson, Esquire Taylor A. Christensen, Esquire Adriane M. Kappauf, Esquire Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP 1201 North Market Street 1313 North Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Wilmington, Delaware 19801

RE: Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. CX360, Inc., C.A. No. 2024-0991-LWW

Dear Counsel:

I write regarding your submissions on the bond that Comcast Cable

Communications Management, LLC must post in connection with the status quo

order I previously entered.

On October 22, I issued a Letter Order outlining that the bond would be

equivalent to the difference between (1) what Comcast would pay CX360, Inc. under

the parties’ Master Services Agreement (the “MSA”) through its February 28, 2025

termination date (the “MSA Amount”), and (2) what Comcast would pay under the

proposed Novation Agreement during the same period (the “Novation Agreement C.A. No. 2024-0991-LWW November 14, 2024 Page 2 of 6

Amount”).1 I explained that the bond should also account for $1,400,000 of

employee retention costs that CX360 anticipates incurring to perform under the

MSA while the status quo order is in place.2

Based on this formulation, CX360 submits that Comcast should post a

$4,482,000 bond.3 It calculates that Comcast would owe $9,246,000 under the

Novation Agreement for November 2024 through February 2025, inclusive of

Comcast’s quarterly prepayments for certain “Non-Managed IVR” services.4 It then

subtracts $6,164,000 it estimates Comcast would owe under the MSA from

November 2024 through February 2025, based on an estimated $1,541,000 monthly

payment.5 Finally, CX360 adds back the $1,400,000 in employee retention costs.6

Using the same formula, Comcast concludes that the bond should total

$2,927,120.7 Comcast’s figure includes the $1,400,000 in employee retention costs.

1 Dkt. 48 at 2 (“Letter Order”). 2 Id. 3 Letter from David A. Seal, Esq., Regarding Bond (Dkt. 53) (“CX360 Bond Letter”) 4. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Id. at 5. 7 Letter from Susan W. Waesco (Dkt. 52) (“Comcast Bond Letter”) 1. C.A. No. 2024-0991-LWW November 14, 2024 Page 3 of 6

But its calculation of the amounts owed under the Novation Agreement and the MSA

diverge from CX360’s assessment.

With regard to the proposed Novation Agreement, Comcast estimates its

monthly payment—$2,000,280—and multiplies this number by four.8 This amount

includes the Novation Agreement’s $1,541,000 fixed monthly rate, plus estimated

professional service hours (charged separately under the Novation Agreement) and

additional expenses (such as SMS and outbound calling).9 In its calculations,

Comcast considered its actual and projected use of these services and the applicable

rates under the Novation Agreement.10 It did not consider the quarterly prepayment

structure outlined in the Novation Agreement.

For the MSA, Comcast’s estimated $6,474,000 payment is $310,000 higher

than CX360’s estimate. To arrive at this figure, Comcast calculates a monthly

payment with three components: (1) its use of “Fully-Managed IVR” services

charged at MSA’s $150 hourly rate; (2) the amount owed for additional expenses

such as SMS and outbound calling; and (3) a monthly “true-up” for the two

remaining months in 2024 based on the annual true-up anticipated under the current

8 Id. at 3. 9 Id. 10 Id. at 3 nn.5 & 6. C.A. No. 2024-0991-LWW November 14, 2024 Page 4 of 6

agreement.11 Based on this calculation, it computes a $1,681,000 monthly payment

for November and December 2024 and a $1,556,000 monthly payment for January

and February 2025.12 Since CX360 does not explain how it arrived at the $1,541,000

monthly payment it estimates Comcast will owe under MSA, I cannot analyze the

differences between the parties’ numbers.

After considering the parties’ submissions, I believe the appropriate Novation

Agreement Amount is $10,259,944. Per the terms of the Novation Agreement, I am

inclined to incorporate the prepayment structure for the Fully-Managed IVR services

into my estimate. Comcast will be required to pay for these services for six months,

at the fixed monthly rate of $1,541,000 per month, for a total payment of $9,246,000.

I also find compelling CX360’s point that the Novation Agreement excludes certain

services it anticipates using, including professional services and other expenses.

Since these payments are not subject to the prepayment structure, Comcast need only

pay these amounts for the four month period from November 2024 through February

2025. In total, these estimated payments add an additional $506,972.

11 Id. at 2. 12 Id. The difference in monthly payments comes from the true-up amount and a higher monthly payment for Fully-Managed IVR services in 2024 projected by Comcast. Id. at 2 n.1. C.A. No. 2024-0991-LWW November 14, 2024 Page 5 of 6

Again, because CX360’s estimate lacks specificity, it is challenging to

understand how its calculations differ from Comcast’s. Comcast’s detailed

calculation appears reasonable. Accordingly, I adopt $6,474,000 as the MSA

Amount.

Based on these values, and inclusive of the $1,400,000 in employee retention

costs, Comcast must post a bond of $5,185,944.13 As I acknowledged in the Letter

Order, “[t]he value of a bond acts as a cap on the damages recoverable by a

wrongfully enjoined party.”14 Thus, “the court should ‘err on the high side’ in setting

the bond.”15 The bond to be posted serves these ends. It will adequately compensate

CX360 for any harm suffered if the status quo order proves improvidently granted.

For completeness, I have also considered CX360’s argument that the

formulation of the bond outlined in the Letter Order is flawed and fails to protect it

from potential losses.16 CX360 did not move for reconsideration of the Letter Order.

Its request that I do so in response to its letter submission is procedurally improper.

13 $10,259,944 - $6,474,000 + $1,400,000 = $5,185,944. 14 Leon v. Orlando, 2024 WL 2862452, at *2 (Del. Ch. June 5, 2024). 15 Letter Order 2 (citing Guzzetta v. Serv. Corp. of Westover Hills, 7 A.3d 467, 470 (Del. 2010)). 16 CX360 Bond Letter 1-2. C.A. No. 2024-0991-LWW November 14, 2024 Page 6 of 6

Regardless, I reject the argument. CX360’s position hinges on Schedule A of

the proposed Novation Agreement, which would require Comcast to accept—or at

least pay for—CX360’s services through the end of 2025.17 According to CX360,

by assuming in my bond formulation that it will cease providing services to Comcast

in February 2025, I assume Comcast will not sign the Novation Agreement in its

current form.18

Though CX360’s position has some logic, it is inconsistent with the core

issues before me. This lawsuit concerns whether CX360 had the right to terminate

the MSA after Comcast chose another service provider. If CX360 prevails on its

arguments under the MSA, Comcast might choose to sign the Novation Agreement.

Or it might not. As such, I decline to order Comcast to post a bond presuming the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. CX360, Inc., (Del. Ct. App. 2024).

Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. CX360, Inc. (Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. CX360, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guzzetta v. SERVICE CORP. OF WESTOVER HILLS
7 A.3d 467 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2010)