Com. v. Schaeffer
Opinion
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Paul R. SCHAEFFER, Jr., Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Paul M. Yatron, Robert A. Graci, Harrisburg, for Atty. General's Office.
Brett O. Feese, Williamsport, Marianne E. Cox, Philadelphia, Robert E. Colville, Robert L. Eberhardt, Pittsburgh, for Com.
Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Philadelphia, for amicus curiae, Philadelphia Dist. Attorney's Office.
David M. McGlaughlin, Philadelphia, for amicus curiae, Pa. Ass'n. of Crim. Defense Lawyers.
Dennis C. McAndrews, Media, for amicus curiae, Pa. Dist. Attorney's Ass'n.
Peter T. Campana, Marc F. Lovecchio, Williamsport, for P.R. Schaeffer.
Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.
*273 ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the decision of these cases.
NIX, C.J., and PAPADAKOS and CASTILLE, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
652 A.2d 294 (Com. v. Schaeffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.